Indiana Governor Braun order establishes Indiana faith-based institutions initiative, spearheaded by Beckwith’s office

Feb 26, 2026. INDIANAPOLIS — A new executive order from Indiana Gov. Mike Braun established the Indiana Faith-Based Institutions Initiative, a program that Braun stated in the order will be run by the office of Indiana Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith.

The initiative aims at encouraging and fostering faith-based institutions to better serve individual Hoosiers, families and communities, according to Executive Order 26-06.

Through this initiative, Beckwith and the lieutenant governor’s office will be able to consult with experts and leaders of faith-based institutions that operate programs in specific areas to help identify areas to “reduce barriers to effective participation of faith-based institutions in addressing societal ills.”

The specific areas outlined in the order include:

  • Increasing civic engagement
  • Promoting recovery from substance use disorder
  • Facilitating prisoner reentry into society
  • Cultivating resilience through work and self-sufficiency
  • Strengthening the family unit
  • Mentoring the next generation
  • Promoting principled morals and character
  • Supporting foster parenting and adoption

The order stands that Braun’s administration believes that the state of Indiana’s “diverse and welcoming faith community” can help bring “unique skills, services and resources to assist with the struggles” that Hoosiers face.

Officials said they believe that these institutions have the capacity to serve in ways different from what government can provide, as well as with effectiveness that “often exceeds that of government.”

In a post on social media from Beckwith, he thanked Braun for moving forward with this program, stating that he is “humbled by his confidence” for his office to spearhead the initiative. Beckwith said he believes that Hoosiers will “benefit from this effort for years to come.”

“By promoting collaboration between state government and faith-based partners, the initiative aims to expand the reach of programs that help Hoosiers overcome addiction, reenter society after incarceration, strengthen their families, develop resilience through work and build meaningful lives rooted in purpose and service,” Beckwith said in the post. “These community-rooted institutions frequently provide forms of support that government alone cannot, and ensuring they are able to participate fully and freely is vital to the well-being of our state.

The order’s emphasis on safeguarding religious liberty and creating a fair, welcoming environment for all qualified service providers reaffirms Indiana’s long-standing commitment to both constitutional principles and community partnership,” Beckwith’s post continued. “Empowering organizations that uplift Hoosiers in times of need strengthens families, enhances civic engagement and broadens pathways to opportunity across our state.”

Liberty Dies Quietly: Why Self-Government Is a Spiritual Issue

By David Joy, Chairman & CEO, This We Defend

Follow David on LinkedIn here

Liberty does not die in a dramatic explosion.  It dies in subtle erosion.

It dies when citizens become consumers.  It dies when comfort replaces conviction.  It dies when the Church confuses silence with wisdom.

America will not collapse because of one election cycle, one Supreme Court ruling, or one cultural trend. Nations rarely fall because of a single blow. They fall because the moral and intellectual infrastructure that sustains freedom decays from within.

And here is the uncomfortable truth: self-government is not first a political issue. It is a spiritual one.

Freedom Requires Formation

A free nation requires self-governing citizens.

Self-governing citizens require discipline.  Discipline requires truth.  Truth requires moral clarity.

Remove moral clarity and liberty cannot survive.

We speak often about “freedom” as though it is a default setting. It is not. Freedom is a disciplined state sustained by people capable of restraining themselves without external force. If citizens cannot govern their appetites, their impulses, their anger, and their greed, then government will step in to do it for them.

Scripture makes this plain: “Like a city whose walls are broken through is a person who lacks self-control.” — Proverbs 25:28

Ancient cities with broken walls were defenseless. They were not conquered because they were unlucky. They were conquered because they were exposed.

The same is true of nations.  The same is true of individuals.

Self-control is not merely a personal virtue. It is a national safeguard.

Indoctrination Is the Enemy of Liberty

Liberty depends on critical thinking. Critical thinking depends on the ability to examine ideas without fear of punishment.

When education shifts from inquiry to ideology, freedom weakens. When students are trained what to think rather than how to think, liberty decays.

This is not hyperbole. It is historical fact.

Totalitarian regimes do not begin with tanks. They begin with classrooms. They begin with the slow reshaping of language, the redefining of terms, the emotional conditioning of young minds to accept ideas without scrutiny.

The Apostle Paul warned about this long ago:

“See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.” — Colossians 2:8

Notice the word: captive.

Captivity is not always physical. It is often intellectual. A mind captured by hollow philosophy will defend its own chains.

When civil discourse is replaced with outrage, when disagreement is labeled hate, when dissent is silenced rather than debated, that is not progress. That is fragility masquerading as virtue.

A society that cannot tolerate open discourse cannot sustain liberty.

Dependency Weakens the Republic

A free people must be productive people.

Entrepreneurship, innovation, small business ownership: these are not merely economic activities. They are expressions of self-governance. They cultivate responsibility, risk tolerance, creativity, and accountability.

A dependency culture, by contrast, erodes initiative. It conditions citizens to look upward for provision rather than outward for opportunity.

Scripture affirms the dignity of work and responsibility:

“The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” — 2 Thessalonians 3:10

This is not cruelty. It is clarity.

Work forms character.  Responsibility strengthens resolve.  Ownership cultivates maturity.

When citizens lose these habits, they lose the muscles required to sustain freedom.

Moral Confusion Is National Suicide

No nation has ever sustained liberty without moral cohesion.

National strength is not first economic. It is not first military. It is not first technological.

It is moral.

When moral categories blur, when right and wrong become subjective, when truth becomes negotiable, when virtue becomes relative, the foundation fractures.

Isaiah warned of this inversion:

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.” — Isaiah 5:20

That is not poetic exaggeration. That is a civilizational warning.

A culture that loses moral clarity does not drift into neutrality. It drifts into chaos. And chaos invites control.

Liberty cannot survive where sin is celebrated and righteousness is mocked.

“Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin condemns any people.” — Proverbs 14:34

This is not partisan rhetoric. It is biblical reality.

The Church Cannot Remain Passive

Here is where this becomes controversial.

The Church often retreats when conversations become political. But when the issue is liberty, self-governance, moral clarity, and truth, we are not talking about party platforms. We are talking about discipleship.

Self-government is fruit of the Spirit territory.

“For the Spirit God gave us does not make us timid, but gives us power, love and self-discipline.” — 2 Timothy 1:7

Power.  Love.  Self-discipline.

These are the traits of a free people.

If the Church does not model courage, moral clarity, intellectual rigor, and disciplined living, then who will?

Silence is not neutrality. It is surrender.

This We Defend

This We Defend exists because liberty does not defend itself.

The core conviction is unapologetic:  If we do not intentionally form citizens capable of sustaining liberty, we will lose it, not to foreign invasion, but to apathy, indoctrination, and moral confusion.

Liberty is not preserved by nostalgia.  It is preserved by formation.

Formation of minds.  Formation of character.  Formation of communities grounded in truth.

A culture that cannot think clearly cannot remain free.  A people unwilling to defend truth will eventually serve lies.

And once liberty is redefined, it rarely returns in its original form.

The Final Question

The question is not whether liberty is under pressure. It is.

The question is whether we are willing to do the disciplined, often unpopular work required to sustain it.

Will we raise children who can think critically?  Will we build businesses that cultivate responsibility?  Will we defend moral truth when it is inconvenient?  Will we model self-government in our own lives?

Because if we cannot govern ourselves, we will be governed.

And history is clear: governments rarely shrink once citizens surrender their strength.

A Call to Action

If you believe liberty is worth defending…

If you understand that freedom requires formation…

If you recognize that self-government is a spiritual responsibility, not merely a political preference…

Stand with This We Defend.

Support the work.  Engage in the mission.  Help build citizens capable of sustaining real liberty.

Because liberty does not die in a day.

It dies in silence.

And silence is a luxury we can no longer afford.

You can reach David at David.Joy@thiswedefend.org.

For more bold and unapologetically Christ-centric content like this, please subscribe to the C-Suite for Christ YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/@csuiteforchrist

Interested in joining the C-Suite for Christ movement?

Then, visit our website to learn how you can help us cover the world in Christ.

Please check us out at https://csuiteforchrist.com/

Special thanks to Custom Service Hardware – Home of Putnam Rolling Ladders for their support.

Custom Service Hardware has proudly served kitchen creators, woodworking professionals, and DIY enthusiasts for over 45 years.

Founded in 1977 in Wisconsin, they’re rooted in faith, craftsmanship, and quality.

From custom cabinetry to iconic Putnam Rolling Ladders, they provide custom-made products, specialty hardware, tools, and support to bring your vision to life.

To learn more, please visit: https://cshardware.com/

The roles of men and women in society: Biblical parallels

In the article, “Young Men and How the Democrats Lost Them” by Sebastian Junger, the focus included how “The recent and very American idea that the sexes are the same or at least interchangeable… loses sight of the evolutionary pressures that underly much of human behavior and risk wandering into ideological nonsense”:

I’m not saying that a rebel attack in Africa should be the basis for our gender roles, or that men and women shouldn’t be exactly who they want to be in our society. But when you lose sight of the evolutionary pressures that underly much of human behavior, you risk wandering into ideological nonsense. The Far Right tries to turn young men into political assets by convincing them they are the “true” victims of today’s society. And the Far Left tries equally hard to convince them that all masculinity is suspect and dangerous, and that the only proper thing for men to do is to back out of the room, apologizing.

Junger concludes by reinfocing the need to respect the differences:

We live in a world of bridges, roads, skyscrapers, foundries, coal mines, and oil derricks. These were built almost exclusively by men who were poorly paid, poorly educated, and suffered appalling death and injury rates. You can’t expect them to do that work, accept the idea they’re toxic, and also vote for your candidate; it’s not happening. If Democrats want to reclaim those votes – and they must – they will have to figure out how to honor the rough, dangerous work men have been designated to do. If they want to win another national election, they will have to figure out how to admire the very qualities – courage, toughness, physical sacrifice – that every society needs.

No political party has ever succeeded by dismissing half the population. Democrats are no exception.

I prompted ChatGPT to identify parallels in themes and roles between the article and biblical teaching—without endorsing or rejecting the article’s claims—just drawing theological and conceptual connections.

The Bottom Line Summary

Parallels:

  • Complementary male/female roles
  • Men as protectors and sacrificers
  • Women as nurturers and life-givers
  • Family as the foundation of society
  • Identity and purpose tied to roles
  • Mutual dependence between sexes

Differences:

  • Bible grounds roles in God’s design and moral theology, not evolutionary pragmatism.
  • Bible emphasizes dignity, covenant, and love rather than survival efficiency.

 

Big Picture Conclusion

  • The article is philosophically closest to complementarianism, even though it is not theological.
    • Complementarianism: sexes are not interchangeable
  • It rejects interchangeability, emphasizes sacrifice, and affirms sex-based differences in function.
  • Egalitarianism aligns with the article’s moral concern for equality, but clashes with its realism about biology, risk, and social survival.
    • Egalitarianism: Men and women can perform the same roles equally
  • Christianity historically tries to hold a tension the article does not fully resolve:
    difference without disposability, authority without domination, sacrifice without dehumanization.

    Reference: ChatGPT – Prompts and Replies: Substack The Roles of Men and Women in Society, Biblical Parallels

The Truth may set you free, but it may take awhile

The new knowledge in managing variation was classified during WWII, declassified after the war, and shared worldwide. It is still a relatively well-kept secret.  Test your knowledge? Can you handle the Truth?
LinkedIn Post.

 “All truth passes through three stages: first, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident.” — Arthur Schopenhauer

“One of the greatest pains to human nature is the pain of a new idea… Naturally, therefore, common men hate a new idea, and are disposed more or less to ill-treat the original man who brings it.” – Walter Bagehot

“The person who fights for a dying cause is admired, supported and honoured. The person who fights for a new cause struggling to be born is misunderstood, reviled and attacked. Nothing is more difficult than taking the lead in a new order of things.” — Dee Hock, Founder & CEO, Visa

Throughout history, people have been punished for saying something an institution or society could not allow to be true or could not even see.

Different centuries, different contexts, same human reflex.

The pattern continues in our organisations today

Galileo Galilei (astronomer & physicist)
His act: Demonstrated that the Earth orbits the sun, contradicting Church doctrine.
Outcome: Tried by the Inquisition (1633), forced to recant and lived the rest of his life under house arrest. The Church took over 300 years to formally admit he was right.

Ignaz Semmelweis (physician, early pioneer of antiseptic practice)
His act: Showed that handwashing with chlorinated water stopped doctors transmitting deadly infections from autopsies to maternity wards.
Outcome: Ridiculed, removed from his post, suffered a breakdown, committed to an asylum and died there from an infected wound. His insight was only accepted after his death.

General Billy Mitchell (U.S. Army aviation pioneer)
His act: Warned that air power would define future warfare and criticised military leaders for neglecting aviation readiness.
Outcome: Court-martialled for insubordination, suspended without pay and forced out. Decades later, WWII proved him correct and he was posthumously honoured.

Roger Boisjoly (NASA engineer)
His act: Warned that the Challenger O-rings would fail in cold weather and urged NASA to delay the launch.
Outcome: After the disaster proved his warning correct, he was shunned and sidelined within his company. Later honoured in ethics circles, but his career there never recovered.

Sinéad O’Connor (musician & activist)
Her act: Protested sexual abuse in the Catholic Church on live television in 1992.
Outcome: Ridiculed, boycotted and condemned for years. Later reinterpreted as someone who named a truth long before society recognised it.

Stanislav Petrov (Soviet lieutenant colonel & air-defence officer)
His act: In 1983, he judged a Soviet nuclear warning to be a false alarm and refused to escalate — preventing a likely nuclear exchange.
Outcome: Reassigned to a lower-level post, denied the commendation he was promised and quietly moved into early retirement. Only after the USSR collapsed was his decision publicly honoured.

The truth-teller becomes the problem long before the truth becomes accepted.